Based on the life design paradigm, career construction adaptation model, and recent directions from the perspective of career guidance, the present study was conducted with the aim of predicting the sustainable career development among students.The current study was a descriptive-survey which used regression analysis method. The statistical population included all bachelor and master degrees of female students at Hazrat-e Masoumeh University in 2021. From this community, 260 students volunteered to participate in research. Data were collected using demographic characteristics questionnaire, sustainable career development scale (Argyropoulou, 2021), life project reflexivity scale (Argyropoulou et al., 2020) & career adaptability scale (Savickas & Profeli, 2012). The data were analyzed and calculated using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (correlation coefficient and regression analysis) and SPSS software. The results showed that there is a positive and significant correlation between the sustainable career development and its dimensions, life project reflexivity and its dimensions, and the career adaptability (p<0/05). Also, life project reflexivity and career adaptability (as predictor variables) describe 0.659 and 0.342 of the variances of the sustainable career development (as the predictor variable) (p<0/05). With attention to the constant changing structure of career systems, it is important to achieve sustainable career development. According to the findings obtained in this study, life project reflexivity and the career adaptability predict sustainable career development. Therefore, based on life project reflexivity and the career adaptability, people can be guided to achieve the sustainable career development.
Introduction
Entering university is the beginning of a new stage in people's career. One of the most important tasks of career development in this period is the clarification of career goals, commitment to the chosen career, and getting ready to take a job position. Therefore, it is important to understand students' abilities to face challenges (Koen & et al., 2012). Career adaptability is one of the competencies that help people to effectively deal with these challenges (Savickas, 2013) and as a “psychological construct that includes the individual's resources to deal with current or anticipated tasks, transitions, and traumas may occur to an individual during a career” (Savickas and Porfeli, 2012, p. 662). This psychological structure has four dimensions of concern (having a positive and forward-looking view of the career), curiosity (searching for the necessary resources in line with the concern and establishing a balance between oneself and the environment in line with the concern), control (being responsible for building one's career) and confidence (a person's belief in his abilities to achieve career goals and manage them) (Ginvera et al., 2021). Due to the importance of the role of career adaptability during the life span, some studies have investigated the antecedents and consequences of career adaptability (Hamzeh et al., 2021; Bo et al., 2021; Meg Nano et al., 2021; Leung et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021).
Method
The current study was a descriptive-survey which used regression analysis method. The statistical population included all bachelor and master degrees of female students at Hazrat-e Masoumeh University in 2021. From this community, 260 students volunteered to participate in research. Data were collected using demographic characteristics questionnaire, sustainable career development scale (Argyropoulou, 2021), life project reflexivity scale (Argyropoulou et al., 2020) & career adaptability scale (Savickas & Profeli, 2012).
Demographic questionnaire, Sustainable Career Development Scale (SCDS( (Argyropoulou, 2021; Mouratoglou et al., 2022), Life Project Reflexivity Scale (LPRS( (Di Fabio et al., 2019) & Career Adaptability Scale (CAAS) (Savickas & Profeli, 2012) have been used to collect data.
Results
Based on the results obtained from Table 2, all the correlation coefficients calculated between sustainable career development and its dimensions, life project reflexivity and its dimensions, and career adaptability are significant. The obtained positive coefficients shows that there is a positive and significant relationship between sustainable career development, life project reflexivity and career adaptability (p<0.01). In Table 3, the F value obtained from the assessment of the regression model was 39.308, which is significant at the alpha level of less than 0.01. This, shows that the sustainable career development can well explain the life project reflexivity. In Table 4, F value obtained from assessment of the regression model was 52.460, which was significant at the alpha level of less than 0.01. This, shows that the career adaptability can well explain the changes related to the sustainable career development. The adjusted R square value was equal to 0.342, which shows that the career adaptability explains 0.342 of the sustainable career development.
Conclusion
Reflection causes the dimensions of career adaptability to be formed based on the meaning of life, which is a factor that improves the level of sustainable career development.